Sonder Inc. x Marriott International: ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—œ๐˜€๐—ป’๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐˜‚๐—ฝ Everyone in hospitality has now seen the news about the Sonder x Marriott dissolution, but what Iโ€ฆ | eric lutz ๐Ÿซ’ | 59 comments

Sonder Inc. x Marriott International: ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—œ๐˜€๐—ป’๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐˜‚๐—ฝ

Everyone in hospitality has now seen the news about the Sonder x Marriott dissolution, but what I haven’t seen is enough conversation about Marriott’s response to affected guests. Below is the email Marriott sent out this weekend, and I genuinely don’t understand how the largest hotel company in the world thinks this is an acceptable standard of care. A few thoughts:

๐Ÿญ. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—น๐˜† ๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—•๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด.๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜.ย 
ยซย Your reservation has been canceled.ย ยป
ยซย Contact your bank for a refund.ย ยป
If the world’s biggest hospitality company is handling service breakdowns the same way an OTA would, at what point do we just classify the brands as OTAs themselves? Because that’s OTA behavior, not hospitality.

๐Ÿฎ. ยซย ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ธ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑย ยป ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐˜† ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ-๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ณ.ย 
A guest books directly with a brand specifically to avoid this experience. They’re loyal. They trust the flag. They expect the brand to own the issue. Telling them to chase down their credit card company? Again, that’s not hospitality, that’s shirking responsibility.

๐Ÿฏ. ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ? ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜†? ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†?ย 
No proactive re-accommodation. No curated alternatives. No gesture of goodwill. Not even a proper apology. This is Marriott, an almost $80B global giant with 30+ brands, reward tiers, and a loyalty program designed to build ยซย emotional connection.ย ยป Yet the actual guest treatment here is indistinguishable from a robotic template cancellation.

๐Ÿฐ. ๐— ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜†.ย 
Brands talk endlessly about ยซย guest experience,ย ยป but when real issues occur, the response exposes the truth: ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น. The brand isn’t hosting the guest anymore, it’s just the website they booked through.

Hospitality is supposed to mean something. It’s supposed to feel like something. If this is the new standard, then it’s no wonder guests struggle to see the difference between booking direct and using a third-party. And that should concern all of us in this industry.


Publiรฉ

dans

par

ร‰tiquettesย :